TCG BENCH / MEASURED INTELLIGENCE

Measure before choosing a model.

Compare model capability, prompts, and tools using measured results. Short experiments are reported separately from the full-year store benchmark.

Explore the full-year store experiment →

Research task comparisons

These are synthetic cases without independent expert review. Repeated answers are not additional independent cases. Development-set improvements do not establish performance on unseen tasks.

StageConfigurationPassed / trialsCasesMedian latencyAccounted USD
development baselinegpt-4.1-mini-2025-04-1412 / 168 × 20.68s$0.0015
development baselinegpt-5-mini-2025-08-0714 / 168 × 22.09s$0.0052
development baselinegpt-6-astra16 / 168 × 21.95s$0.0511
development ablationGPT-4.1 Mini + TCG harness16 / 168 × 21.03s$0.0035
development ablationGPT-4.1 Mini + revised prompt12 / 168 × 20.74s$0.0018
fresh synthetic challengeGPT-6 Astra24 / 2412 × 22.11s$0.0979
fresh synthetic challengeGPT-4.1 Mini13 / 2412 × 20.90s$0.0027
fresh synthetic challengeGPT-4.1 Mini + TCG harness24 / 2412 × 21.80s$0.0084

The harness may use additional model calls, so its improvement is not free. These samples remain too small to establish general superiority.

Store decision pilot

Matched development scenarios, 1 days each, up to 8 actions per day, with the same information limits. This is a short diagnostic, not a 365-day ranking.

ModelScenarioStatusDaysErrors / tool callsDifference vs holdAccounted USD
gpt-4.1-mini-2025-04-142201complete10 / 7$0.00$0.0140
gpt-4.1-mini-2025-04-142202complete10 / 6$0.00$0.0121
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-072201complete12 / 8$0.00$0.0127
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-072202complete12 / 8$0.00$0.0119
gpt-6-astra2201complete10 / 8$519.04$0.4687
gpt-6-astra2202complete10 / 8$650.14$0.4533

Incomplete attempts receive no ranking. Original failure records are retained.

store-baseline (unpaced): incomplete · Completed trials: 1 · Errors: 1

store-baseline-paced (3-day chat profile): incomplete · Completed trials: 4 · Errors: 1

Cost and next steps

Pilot cap: $5. Conservatively accounted cost: $2.182.

We are building a shared research harness first. Fine-tuning should target persistent errors demonstrated on fresh evaluation data. Newer models may perform better; matched testing must establish where.

Read the full-year benchmark methodology →Updated: 2026-09-13T19:01:42.213689+00:00
TCG BENCH / RESEARCH ASSISTANT

Make sense of the evidence.

Answers use the measured benchmark reports and their stated limitations.

Checking assistant availability…